State of Minnesota vs. 0.0.
- Result: Case Dismissed
- Date: July 1, 2011
- Location: Hennepin County District Court (Fourth Judicial District)
- Offense Type: Felony; Prohibited Person in Possession of a Firearm (Minn. Stat. § 624.713.1(2))
- Summary: Mr. Wilson moved the court to suppress evidence (firearm) based on an unconstitutional search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 10 of the Minnesota Constitution. At the motion hearing, Mr. Wilson made an oral argument and cross examined the police officer(s) involved in the case. Mr. Wilson also submitted a written brief in support of the motion. After taking the case under advisement, the court ultimately granted the suppression motion, ordering that the illegally seized evidence could not be used at trial. The case was subsequently dismissed by the prosecutor.
State of Minnesota vs. 0.0.
- Result: Case Dismissed
- Date: August 30, 2011
- Location: Hennepin County District Court (Fourth Judicial District)
- Offense Type: Felony; Prohibited Person in Possession of a Firearm (Minn. Stat. § 624.713.1(2))
- Summary: Mr. Wilson filed a motion to suppress evidence (a firearm) based on an unconstitutional search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 10 of the Minnesota Constitution. At the motion hearing, Mr. Wilson made an oral argument and cross examined the police officer(s) involved in the case. Mr. Wilson also submitted a written brief in support of the motion. After taking the case under advisement, the court granted the suppression motion. The Hennepin County Attorney’s Office subsequent dismissed the case, based on the suppression order.
State of Minnesota vs. 0.0.
- Result: Case Dismissed
- Date: September 12, 2011
- Location: Anoka County District Court (Tenth Judicial District)
- Offense Type: Felony; Aiding/Abetting Financial Transaction Card Fraud; Aiding/Abetting Identity Theft
- Maximum Punishment: Up to Five Years Imprisonment and/or $3,000.00-$10,000.00 fine.
- Summary: After thoroughly reviewing all the evidence in the case, Mr. Wilson negotiated with the prosecutor in the case to dismiss one of the charges (Aid/Abet Financial Transaction Card Fraud) and Stay Imposition of the other charge (Aid/Abet Identity Theft). The client was sentenced to probation and served no jail time. The offense level was ultimately reduced to a misdemeanor upon the discharge of the client’s sentence.